English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Study design: Systematic review and expert opinion. Background: Patients with cervical spine injuries without neurological deficit form a substantial portion of most spine surgeons’ practices. Patients’ expectations regarding quality-of-life outcomes are highly dependent on the information provided by surgeons early in the treatment course [1]. Our previous work has demonstrated that there is substantial variability in what surgeons tell patients regarding outcomes of these injuries; thus patient expectations will differ and outcomes vary [2]. Objective: An objective, systematic, evidence-based approach to providing guidelines to patients at the time of injury is needed to reduce variability. Methods: Five common cervical spine injuries and treatments (Jefferson and Hangman fracture treated nonoperatively, odontoid fracture treated with anterior or posterior fixation, and unilateral facet fracture treated operatively) were considered (Table 1). A systematic review of the available medical literature from 1980 to 2010 was conducted, and combined with expert opinion from a recent survey of spine surgeons who treat traumatic spinal injury. From these two sources, we assessed the evidence regarding five health-related quality-of-life outcomes: time to return to work, activity level, hospital stay, and the proportion of patients who are pain free and have regained full range of motion at 1 year postinjury. Results: Published outcome data was available for most injuries, especially facet and odontoid fractures. Using consensus expert opinion and the literature, answers to each question were achieved. For example, in Jefferson fractures 35% of patients experience persistent neck or scalp pain and SF-36 PC scores average ten points lower than normative values. No studies have assessed return to manual or labor work, but expert consensus recommended 5 months. Overall, expert opinion was relatively homogeneous across injury types, suggesting that experts do not distinguish between specific injuries when advising patients of expected outcomes such as pain (Fig 1).

A synthesis of best available evidence and expert opinion on outcomes after cervical trauma: what should surgeons be telling their patients?