English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background and study aims  Endoscopic findings of esophageal eosinophilia sometimes localize to small areas of the esophagus. A previous study suggested that pathogenesis of localized-type eosinophilic esophagitis (LEoE) was associated with acid reflux. However, LEoE treatment outcomes have not been studied. We aimed to analyze the clinical and histologic significance of LEoE in comparison with diffuse-type eosinophilic esophagitis (DEoE). Patients and methods  This study included 106 patients with esophageal eosinophilia. Esophageal eosinophilia was defined as a condition where the maximum number of intraepithelial eosinophils was ≥ 15 per high-power field. LEoE was defined as an endoscopic lesion confined to one-third of the esophagus: upper, middle, or lower. Esophageal eosinophilia encompassing more than two-thirds of the esophagus was defined as DEoE. We retrospectively compared LEoE and DEoE in terms of clinical characteristics, histologic findings, and proportion of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) responders. Results  Of 106 patients, 12 were classified as having LEoE and 94 were classified as having DEoE. The proportion of asymptomatic patients was significantly higher in the LEoE group than the DEoE group (42 % vs 7 %, P  &lt; 0.01). In the LEoE group, 10 patients (84 %) had endoscopic lesions in the lower esophagus. The maximum number of eosinophils did not differ between the groups (54 [24 - 71] for LEoE, 40 [20 - 75] for DEoE, P  = 0.65). The prevalence of PPI responders was significantly higher in the LEoE group than the DEoE group (100 % vs 63 %, P  = 0.01). Conclusion  LEoE can be a sign of good responsiveness to PPI therapy.

Association between endoscopic findings of eosinophilic esophagitis and responsiveness to proton pump inhibitors