English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Borda Count Method is an important theory in the field of voting theory. Thebasic idea and implementation methodology behind the approach is simple andstraight forward. Borda Count Method has been used in sports award evaluationsand many other scenarios, and therefore is an important aspect of our society.An often ignored ground truth is that online cultural rating platforms such asDouban.com and Goodreads.com often adopt integer rating values for large scalepublic audience, and therefore leading to Poisson/Pareto behavior. In thispaper, we rely on the theory developed by Wang from 2021 to 2023 to demonstratethat online cultural rating platform rating data often evolve intoPoisson/Pareto behavior, and individualistic voting preferences are predictablewithout any data input, so Borda Count Method (or, Range Voting Method) hasintrinsic fallacy and should not be used as a voting theory method.

shs web of conferences

The Fallacy of Borda Count Method -- Why it is Useless with Group  Intelligence and Shouldn't be Used with Big Data including Banking Customer  Services