English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The paper addresses some issues related to the application of evaluation categories of civil law in the consideration of disputes over the compensation for damages in the context of the “digitalization” of law. It is proposed to understand the “digital losses” as losses caused in the digital sphere, or related to violations of digital rights, which would otherwise be understood by the legislator and researchers, since this does not have any effect on the essence of the institution of compensation for damages. Anticipating criticism from legal theorists, we distinguish between the terms “concept” and “category”, but due to the fact that in literature and judicial practice the “evaluation concept” and “evaluation category” are used more often as synonyms, we are forced to turn to this particular option.

Impact of valuation concepts (categories) in modern conditions on the recovery of “digital losses”