English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The overlapping disciplinary discourses of globalization are built in the perspective of the  absence of  its  concept ; the concept presupposes the disclosure of  meaning , that is, a philosophical interpretation. The representation of the globalization of the  form of modernity  actualizes its philosophical understanding and sets the perspective for defining its concept; concepts of the “third era of liberation” I.G. Fichte, “the era of nihilism” F. Nietzsche and M. Heidegger’s “closing period of modern times” are presented as the horizon of the philosophical interpretation of globalization as  planetarism , the essential (conceptual) features of which are “destruction of space” as the removal of boundaries and “compression of time” to  total modernity , provided by  technology  as the arche of modernity. In a metaphysical concept, there is a combination of the real and the actual, which for the new time is essentially  subjective ; the new European subject and the idea of technology  are one essence  and there is a  beginning  from which modernity unfolds and is interpreted, which remains for modernity itself both “unnecessary” and “impossible” (M. Heidegger). The article demonstrates the impossibility of the  concept of  globalization for the dominant view of modernity in the economic paradigm (J. Agamben) and the essential  non-reality  of Heidegger’s concept of  planetarism  for  modern  disciplinarily arranged science. It is concluded that the real  challenge  is the  impossibility of comprehension  with the absolute exclusion of the  possibility of a response .

Disciplinary discourses of globalization in the horizon of lack of meaning: “challenge” and the search for an “response”