English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In a certain sense, law and philosophy equally claim to be the fundamental basis of human activity. The present paper examines the problem of possible common field of interpretation for philosophical and legal hermeneutics, where a situation of mutual convergence could overcome a potential “conflict of interpretations”. The interpretive nature of truth in hermeneutics reveals a multiplicity of possible foundations both in the principles of philosophy and in the concepts and norms of law. Hence, the main common task of philosophical and legal hermeneutics is the creation of a new sense of legality. The right is the establishment of some boundaries. But the philosophy is to put any boundaries and grounds in question, including the question of its own right. Therefore, the problem of legal philosophy inevitably leads us to questions about the right of philosophy and the right to philosophy.

To the problem of the hermeneutics of the legal foundations of philosophy