English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) has issued two policy documents on the subject of traceability and measurement uncertainty: ILAC P10[1] and ILAC P14[2]. All accreditation bodies (ABs) that have signed the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) are obligated to implement these policies. The authors describe one AB’s perspective on the difficulties encountered and lessons learned when implementing ILAC P10 and P14. This paper also offers insight into the AB’s decison-making process when creating requirements for accredited organizations with regard to measurement traceability and uncertainty.

Traceability: implementing ILAC P10 and ILAC P14 – one accreditation body’s perspective