English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article is devoted to comparison of finite element marking criteria for adaptive mesh refinement while solving plane Cosserat elasticity problems. The goal is to compare the resulting adaptive meshes obtained with different marking strategies. Mesh refinement and error control is done using the functional type a posteriori error majorant. Implemented algorithms use the zero-order Raviart-Thomas approximation on triangular meshes. Four widely used marking criteria are utilized for mesh adaptation. The comparative analysis is presented for two plane-strain problems.

Analysis of marking criteria for mesh adaptation in Cosserat elasticity