English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

countries women Ambient [71 1 &2€ Cu75Ni25 Ni100 Ni 3.1 t 0.8 0.31 ± 0.08 0.50tO.16 0.55 to.23 Cu 11.4±3.5 1.95 ± 0.54 1.77 t 0.54 0.16 ± 0.09 Zn 18.8±5.8 0.29 ± 0.09 0.04 ± 0.03 0.09 ± 0.06 Area 2 faces (cm \ 8.5 & 10.4 11.8 11.0 Manipulation tests To take friction into account,we have evaluatedmetal contamination from coins by means of a simple test that simulates daily handling [7]; participating volunteers count a set of coins by transferring them from one polyethylene container to another, and metal contamination sampled bywiping the fingers with cellulose cloths is analysed by inductively-coupled plasma emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Details ofthe procedure canbe found in references [7] and [12]. Table 1 summarizes the results of such tests carried out by 3 people counting three sets of25 used coins each: bi-metallic euros (12 pieces of 1€ and 13 of2€), Cu75Ni25 copper-nickel coins (2SFr), and pure-nickel2FF pieces. The first two sets were taken from circulation in a non-industrial environment early 2003, and the last in the beginning of 2002. These 2FFcoins had since been stored in a closed polyethylene container. All coins were counted as collected.

Euro coins and the potential risk of nickel allergy