English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Under standard test conditions, the spectral irradiance of artificial solar light sources and the spectral response of photovoltaic devices are important factors that affect the accuracy of device test results. This paper takes the standard solar spectrum AM1.5 as a reference, and calculates the difference between the four commonly used artificial solar light sources (Arc Lamp, Q-Flash, Q-Flash w and ELH) and the standard solar spectrum AM1.5 from the perspective of spectral mismatch. The spectral mismatch factor and the output parameters of the amorphous silicon cell under the irradiation of these light sources. Calculations show that the spectral mismatch factor of Arc Lamp is only 1.005, which matches the standard solar spectrum AM1.5 best. Due to the effect of spectral mismatch, the output parameters of amorphous silicon cells will change significantly after different artificial light sources irradiate them.

Spectral mismatch and its effect on artificial solar light source under standard test conditions