English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The construction of a new countryside requires a compr hensive improvement in the building standards of villages and towns, and the seismic resistance of buildings in earthquake-prone areas has attracted much attention. Due to the backward economic development of villages and towns, the development of seismic isolation structure and energy dissipation structure is hindered. To build houses with better seismic performance, the economic efficiency of seismic isolation and energy dissipation structures has become a matter of close concern to the local people and the government. This article compares the economic differences between the original seismic structure, the base isolation structure, and the seismic damping structure from the costs incurred during the entire life cycle of the building, and provides economic reference for the new rural seismic isolation building.

Economic performance analysis of seismic isolation, energy dissipation, and traditional seismic structures