English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The performance analysis of a building structure under inelastic conditions consisted of static and dynamic methods, which each divided into linear and non-linear categories. The performance-based analysis was included in the non-linear static category and described in the Applied Technology Council (ATC)-40, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 273, FEMA 356, and FEMA 440. In this study, some structural open frame models were assessed to determine the structural performance level. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the open frame building structural models using pushover analysis based on SNI-1726-2002, SNI-1726-2012, and ATC-40 codes. The structural element properties were modeled based on SNI-1726-2002 to represent the buildings previously constructed before the application of SNI-1726-2012. The results showed that the open frame structural models analysed based on SNI-1726-2012 code, had a lower performance points and structural performance levels compared to their counterpart models which were analysed based on SNI-1726-2002 code. Other models showed the opposite behavior due to differences in the characteristics of seismic zones, represented by the response spectrum curves in the SNI-1726-2002 and SNI-1726-2012 codes.

Comparison of structural performance of open frame structures based on SNI 03-1726-2002 and SNI 03-1726-2012