English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG and CAG regimen alone. Methods: Comparison the effectiveness, overall survival and incidence of adverse reactions of 42 cases of MDS used decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen (decitabine 20mg/m2, once a day, d1-3, Accra neomycin 7mg/m2,intravenous injection, once a day, d4-7, cytarabine 10mg/m2, every 12 hours, d4-10, granulocyte colony stimulating factor 300μg, once a day, d4-10, white blood cell count>20×109/L when deactivated for four courses) and 48 patients in MDS were treated with chemotherapy alone CAG (Accra neomycin 14mg/m2,once a day, d1-3, cytarabine 10mg/m2, every 12 hours, d1-14, granulocyte colony stimulating factor 300μg, once a day, d1-14, white blood cell count>20×109/L when deactivated). Results: Compared with pure CAG, clinical efficacy of decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen is better, the treatment does not increase the risk

bio web of conferences/bio web of conferences

Comparison of clinical efficacy between decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen with CAG regimen alone in patients with inermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome