English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background/Purpose When working with a specialized population, it is necessary to have the appropriate clinical and academic training. However, many speech-language pathologists report being ill-prepared regarding best practice when evaluating and treating patients with low-incidence disorders, particularly cleft palate/craniofacial anomalies and fluency disorders. The purpose of this study was to compare differences in graduate speech-language pathology coursework in the United States across two low-incidence disorder areas: cleft/craniofacial anomalies and fluency disorders. Method A review of the accredited graduate curricula offerings within these domains was completed. Information whether coursework in these areas was offered, if the course was taught as a full course or embedded within a related course, or whether the content was required or an elective, and if the course was taught by an expert was obtained. Results Significant differences were present in the amount, quality, and type of course content offered for cleft/craniofacial anomalies compared to fluency disorders. Only 72.83% of graduate speech-language pathologist programs offered content in cleft/craniofacial anomalies. Approximately one out of every four programs (27.17%) did not provide this content within the graduate curriculum. In contrast, content in fluency disorders was taught in 99.28% of graduate programs. Conclusion Results demonstrate that graduate training in topics related to cleft/craniofacial anomalies is significantly limited, particularly in comparison to another low-incidence communication disorder.

Academic Education of the Speech-Language Pathologist: A Comparative Analysis on Graduate Education in Two Low-Incidence Disorder Areas