English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

1. The selectivity observed when the potentially general technique for the isolation of fully active forms of cysteine proteinases, covalent chromatography by thiol-disulphide interchange, is applied to chymopapain M and to actinidin was investigated by a combination of experimentation and computer modelling. Neither of these enzymes is able to react with the original Sepharose-GSH-2-dipyridyl disulphide gel, but fully active forms of both enzymes are obtained by using Sepharose-2-hydroxypropyl-2'-dipyridyl disulphide gel, which is both electrically neutral and sterically less demanding than the GSH gel. Electrostatic potential calculations, minimization and molecular-dynamics simulations provide explanations for the unusual, but different, specificities exhibited by actinidin and chymopapain M in the interactions of their active centres with ligands. 2. The unique behaviour of chymopapain M in exerting an almost absolute specificity for substrates with glycine at the P1 position and in resisting inhibition by cystatin was examined by the computer-modelling techniques. A new, modelled, structure of the complete chicken egg-white cystatin molecule based on the crystal structure of a short form of cystatin was deduced as a necessary prerequisite. The results suggest that electrostatic repulsion prevents reaction of actinidin with the GSH gel, whereas a steric 'cap' resulting from a unique arginine-65-glutamic acid-23 interaction in chymopapain M prevents reaction of the gel with this enzyme and accounts for the lack of its inhibition by cystatin and its specificity in catalysis. 3. Use of chymopapain M as a structural variant of papain demonstrates the validity of the predictions of Lowe and Yuthavong [Biochem. J. (1971) 124, 107-115] relating to the structural requirements and binding characteristics of the S1 subsite of papain.

biochemical journal

The structural origins of the unusual specificities observed in the isolation of chymopapain M and actinidin by covalent chromatography and the lack of inhibition of chymopapain M by cystatin