English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

1. The uptake of ovalbumin (OVA) in rat liver parenchymal cells (PC) and non-parenchymal cells was studied in vivo and in vitro in order to compare the cellular expression of glycoprotein receptors and the kinetics of intracellular transport of ligand endocytosed by these receptors. 2. Ovalbumin was labelled with 125I or with 125I-tyramine-cellobiose (125I-TC). By using 125I-TC-OVA the labelled degradation products were trapped in the cells. 3. 125I-TC-OVA was rapidly cleared from blood mainly by receptor-mediated uptake in the liver. At 30 min after injection, 50% of the ligand was recovered in the liver. The endothelial cells (EC) and the PC were the predominant cell types responsible for uptake. 4. The uptake in PC was strongly inhibited by asialo-orosomucoid (AOM), but not by mannan, indicating that the uptake in these cells was mediated by the galactose receptor and not by the mannose receptor. This finding is compatible with the observation that a proportion of the OVA contains terminal galactose residues in the carbohydrate moiety. 5. In vitro uptake of OVA in cultured EC was saturable and inhibited by mannan, mannose, fructose, N-acetylglucosamine, EDTA or monensin, but not by galactose or AOM. The uptake of OVA in these cells was therefore mediated by the mannose receptor. 6. To label the organelles involved in endocytosis in PC and EC, 125I-TC-OVA was injected intravenously together with an excess of either AOM or mannan. In this way the labelled ligand could be directed selectively to EC or PC respectively. Subcellular fractionation of total liver in sucrose and Nycodenz gradients revealed that in EC the intracellular transport of OVA is so fast that endocytosed ligand accumulates and thus increases the density of the lysosomes. Conversely, in PC transfer of ligand is slower, with the result that accumulation of undegraded ligand in the lysosomes does not occur. These findings are interpreted to mean that in EC the rate-limiting step of handling of endocytosed ligand is intralysosomal degradation, whereas in PC the rate-limiting step is transport of ligand to the lysosomes. 7. Altogether, these findings suggest that endocytosis of OVA by the liver EC and PC is mediated by mannose and galactose receptors respectively, and that the kinetics of intracellular transport of OVA differ in the two cell types.

biochemical journal

Receptor-mediated endocytosis of ovalbumin by two carbohydrate-specific receptors in rat liver cells. The intracellular transport of ovalbumin to lysosomes is faster in liver endothelial cells than in parenchymal cells