English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A new database, 16OSTM10, containing 10 conformations for each of 16 non-multireference realistic-size open-shell transition metal (OSTM) complexes has been developed. Contemporary composite density functional theory (DFT) (PBEh-3c and B97-3c), semiempirical (PM6 and PM7) and the GFN n -xTB/FF family methods were examined against conventional DFT (PBE-D3(BJ), PBE0-D3(BJ), M06 and ωB97X-V) to reproduce the conformational energies. While good performance is observed for the conventional (the average Pearson correlation coefficient is ρ = 0.91) and composite DFT (average ρ = 0.93), semiempirical and force-field methods should still be used with caution for these challenging compounds. The corresponding average ρ values are 0.53 (PM6 and PM7), 0.75 (GFN1-xTB and GFN2-xTB) and 0.62 (GFN-FF). Accounting for the intramolecular dispersion interactions turned out to be crucial for 4 OSTM complexes bearing bulky substituents in close proximity to each other. The influence of the scalar relativistic effects on the conformational energies is negligible for the considered 3d metal species.

16OSTM10: a new open-shell transition metal conformational energy database to challenge contemporary semiempirical and force field methods