English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Networks of nanowires are currently under consideration for a wide range ofelectronic and optoelectronic applications. Nanowire devices are usually madeby sequential deposition, which inevitably leads to stacking of the wires ontop of one another. Here we demonstrate the effect of stacking on the topologyof the resulting networks. We compare perfectly 2D networks with quasi3Dnetworks, and compare both nanowire networks to the corresponding WattsStrogatz networks, which are standard benchmark systems. By investigatingquantities such as clustering, path length, modularity, and small worldpropensity we show that the connectivity of the quasi-3D networks issignificantly different to that of the 2D networks, a result which may haveimportant implications for applications of nanowire networks.

Nanowire networks: how does small-world character evolve with dimensionality?