English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

For the sake of comparison, a single cell with nanofiber-based LST-GDC composite anode (Cell-1) and a single cell with nanoparticle-based LST-GDC composite anode (Cell-2) are fabricated, respectively. The electrolyte ohmic resistances of the LST-GDC composite anode side half-cells are determined by an AC resistance measurement. Current interrupt is applied to measure the ohmic resistance of the half-cells. Combined with V - I characteristics, the influences of the potential drops caused by electrolyte ohmic resistance, electrode ohmic resistance and electrode electrochemical reaction on the cell kinetics are investigated. Under a current density of 0.6 A cm -2 at 850 °C, for the nanofiber-based LST-GDC composite anode (NF-LST-GDC), the electrode ohmic potential drop is 0.007 V and the potential drop caused by the electrode electrochemical reaction is 0.080 V. While for the nanoparticle-based LST-GDC composite anode (NP-LST-GDC), the corresponding potential drops are 0.159 V and 0.246 V, respectively. Both the potential drops of the former are lower than those of the latter. The kinetics of Cell-1 is greater than Cell-2, i.e. , the kinetics of NF-LST-GDC is greater than that of NP-LST-GDC.

Analysis of nanofiber-based La0.2Sr0.8TiO3–Gd0.2Ce0.8O1.9electrode kinetics

Analysis of nanofiber-based La_0.2Sr_0.8TiO₃–Gd_0.2Ce_0.8O_1.9electrode kinetics