English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The focus of this study is to understand the origin of the chiral recognition for a host-guest system containing complexes with different stoichiometries. Each enantiomer of 2-naphthyl-1-ethanol forms two different 1 : 1 complexes with β-cyclodextrin, leading to the formation of three different 2 : 2 complexes. One of these 2 : 2 complexes leads to excimer emission of the guest. Fluorescence studies were employed to determine the binding isotherms for the 1 : 1 and 2 : 2 complexes. No chiral discrimination was directly observed for the formation of the 1 : 1 complexes, while higher equilibrium constants (29% from binding isotherms and 40% from kinetic studies) were observed for the formation of the 2 : 2 complexes with (R)-2-naphthyl-1-ethanol when compared to the formation of the 2 : 2 complexes formed from (S)-2-naphthyl-1-ethanol. The relaxation kinetics was studied using stopped-flow experiments. The formation of the 2 : 2 complexes was followed by detecting the excimer emission from one of the 2 : 2 complexes. The relaxation kinetics was faster for (S)-2-naphthyl-1-ethanol, where a higher dissociation rate constant, by 47%, was observed, suggesting that the chiral discrimination occurs because the interaction between two cyclodextrins is more favorable for the complexes containing (R)-2-naphthyl-1-ethanol when compared to (S)-2-naphthyl-1-ethanol. The same overall equilibrium constants were observed for the 1 : 1 complexes with both enantiomers showing that at a given cyclodextrin concentration the sum of the two types of 1 : 1 complexes is the same for both enantiomers. However, analysis of the binding isotherms indicates that the ratio between the two different 1 : 1 complexes for each enantiomer was different for (R)- and (S)-2-naphthyl-1-ethanol.

Chiral recognition for the complexation dynamics of β-cyclodextrin with the enantiomers of 2-naphthyl-1-ethanol