English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We investigated the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessing cervical spinal cord injury in patients where there was no evidence of bone injury on radiographs, and examined the relationship between the MRI findings and the clinical prognosis of this injury. MRI allowed us to confirm directly the cause and severity of spinal cord compression in 30 of 31 cases. The patients with severe spinal cord compression demonstrated by MRI showed poor neurological improvement. In regard to the signal changes in the spinal cord, the patients who showed no signal change on T1- and T2-weighted images had a better prognosis. MRI is a very useful non-invasive adjunctive imaging modality for diagnosis of this injury and for the evaluation of the compressed spinal cord. It also demonstrates potential in predicting neurological recovery.

MRI findings in patients with a cervical spinal cord injury who do not show radiographic evidence of a fracture or dislocation