English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Spinal injury patients initially treated by intermittent catheterisation (IUC) and those who received a fine-bore suprapubic catheter (SPC) have been reviewed. The results show that fine-bore suprapubic catheterisation seems to be superior to intermittent catheterisation because the rate of urinary tract infections is significantly lower in the SPC-group (50%) than in the IUC-patients (71.9%), and the first infecting organisms in the SPC-group differ from those in the IUC-group and are much more easily treated by antibiotic therapy.

Intermittent catheterisation versus percutaneous suprapubic cystostomy in the early management of traumatic spinal cord lesions