English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A prospective trial, comparing fine-bore suprapubic catheterisation and intermittent urethral catheterisation as methods of bladder drainage in the acute stage following spinal cord injury, was conducted. The results showed no important difference in either method of bladder management. Fine-bore suprapubic catheterisation is particularly suitable for young female patients, who find repeated urethral catheterisation distasteful; in other patients it is an acceptable alternative to intermittent urethral catheterisation, particularly where economic considerations are paramount.

A comparison of fine-bore suprapubic and an intermittent urethral catheterisation regime after spinal cord injury