English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The potential risks of  Bt  rice on non-target arthropods (NTAs) should be evaluated and defined before commercial production. Recently, effects of  Bt  rice on NTAs under abiotic and biotic stress conditions attracted much attention. Here we reported the effects of  Bt  rice T1C-19 (Cry1C rice) on the non-target herbivore,  Nilaparvata lugens  (rice brown planthopper, BPH) with or without RDV ( rice dwarf virus ) infection conditions. BPH showed no feeding and oviposition preference between  Bt  rice T1C-19 and its non- Bt  parental rice Minghui 63 (MH63), as well as between RDV-infected and RDV-free rice plants. Meanwhile, rice type, RDV infection status, and their interaction had little impacts on the survival, development and fecundity of BPH. By comparison with non- Bt  control,  Bt  rice T1C-19 with or without RDV infection had no significant effects on the life-table parameters of BPH including  r   m  ,  R   0  ,  T , DT and  λ . Thus, it could be concluded that  Bt  rice T1C-19 doesn’t affect the ecological fitness of BPH either under RDV stress or not.

Cry1C rice doesn’t affect the ecological fitness of rice brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens either under RDV stress or not