English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The fitness model was introduced in the literature to expand the Barabasi-Albert model’s generative mechanism, which produces scale-free networks under the control of degree. However, the fitness model has not yet been studied in a comprehensive context because most models are built on invariant fitness as the network grows and time-dynamics mainly concern new nodes joining the network. This mainly static consideration restricts fitness in generating scale-free networks only when the underlying fitness distribution is power-law, a fact which makes the hybrid fitness models based on degree-driven preferential attachment to remain the most attractive models in the literature. This paper advances the time-dynamic conceptualization of fitness, by studying scale-free networks generated under topological fitness that changes as the network grows, where the fitness is controlled by degree, clustering coefficient, betweenness, closeness, and eigenvector centrality. The analysis shows that growth under time-dynamic topological fitness is indifferent to the underlying fitness distribution and that different topological fitness generates networks of different topological attributes, ranging from a mesh-like to a superstar-like pattern. The results also show that networks grown under the control of betweenness centrality outperform the other networks in scale-freeness and the majority of the other topological attributes. Overall, this paper contributes to broadening the conceptualization of fitness to a more time-dynamic context.

Detecting differences in the topology of scale-free networks grown under time-dynamic topological fitness