English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

To determine the safety of low-calcium-dialysate in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and its effects on coronary artery calcification (CAC) and analyze clinical risk factors for CAC. A total of 174 MHD patients were recruited and randomly divided into two groups: high-calcium dialysate (HCD, 1.5 mmol/L Ca 2+ ) and low-calcium dialysate (LCD, 1.25 mmol/L Ca 2+ ). Changes in CAC score (CACS) and cardiac function were evaluated using spiral computed tomography and echocardiography, respectively. Clinical and laboratory parameters were measured. Intra-dialysis adverse reactions were recorded and compared between the two groups. CACS was significantly lower in the LCD group than in the HCD group by the end of the study. Cardiac E/A max  was significantly higher in the LCD group than in the HCD group by the end of the study. There was no significant difference in the frequency of any intra-dialysis adverse reactions between the two groups during the study. LCD is helpful in maintaining cardiac diastolic function and postponing CAC progression. LCD does not increase intra-dialysis adverse reactions. Age may be the most important factor impacting CAC in MHD patients.

Safety of Low-calcium Dialysate and its Effects on Coronary Artery Calcification in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis