English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Fluctuating asymmetry is a classic concept linked to organismal development. It has traditionally been used as a measure of developmental instability, which is the inability of an organism to buffer environmental fluctuations during development. Developmental stability has a genetic component that influences the final phenotype of the organism and can lead to congenital disorders. According to alternative hypotheses, this genetic component might be either the result of additive genetic effects or a by-product of developmental gene networks. Here we present a genome-wide association study of the genetic architecture of fluctuating asymmetry of the skull shape in mice. Geometric morphometric methods were applied to quantify fluctuating asymmetry: we estimated fluctuating asymmetry as Mahalanobis distances to the mean asymmetry, correcting first for genetic directional asymmetry. We applied the marginal epistasis test to study epistasis among genomic regions. Results showed no evidence of additive effects but several interacting regions significantly associated with fluctuating asymmetry. Among the candidate genes overlapping these interacting regions we found an over-representation of genes involved in craniofacial development. A gene network is likely to be associated with skull developmental stability, and genes originally described as buffering genes (e.g., Hspa2) might occupy central positions within these networks, where regulatory elements may also play an important role. Our results constitute an important step in the exploration of the molecular roots of developmental stability and the first empirical evidence about its genetic architecture.

Epistasis regulates the developmental stability of the mouse craniofacial shape