English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

BackgroundTo evaluate a whole-body rapid imaging technique to calculate neonatal lean body mass and percentage adiposity using 3.0 Tesla chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).MethodsA 2-Point Dixon MRI technique was used to calculate whole-body fat and water images in term (n=10) and preterm (n=15) infants.ResultsChemical shift images were obtained in 42 s. MRI calculated whole-body mass correlated closely with measured body weight (R 2 =0.87; P&lt;0.001). Scan-rescan analysis demonstrated a 95% limit of agreement of 1.3% adiposity. Preterm infants were born at a median of 25.7 weeks' gestation with birth weight 840 g. At term-corrected age, former preterm infants were lighter than term-born controls, 2,519 vs. 3,094 g regressing out age and group as covariates (P=0.005). However, this was not because of reduced percentage adiposity 26% vs. 24% (P=0.28). At term-corrected age, former preterm infants had significantly reduced lean body mass compared with that of term-born controls 1,935 vs. 2,416 g (P=0.002).ConclusionRapid whole-body imaging for assessment of lean body mass and adiposity in term and preterm infants is feasible, accurate, and repeatable. Deficits in whole-body mass in former preterm infants at term-corrected age are due to reductions in lean body mass not due to differences in adiposity.

High-resolution rapid neonatal whole-body composition using 3.0 Tesla chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging