English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Phylogenetic analyses of large and diverse data sets generally result in large sets of competing phylogenetic trees. Consensus tree methods used to summarize sets of competing trees discard important information regarding the similarity and distribution of competing trees. A more fine grain approach is to use a dimensionality reduction method to project tree-to-tree distances in 2D or 3D space. In this study, we systematically evaluate the performance of several nonlinear dimensionality reduction (NLDR) methods on tree-to-tree distances obtained from independent nonparametric bootstrap analyses of genes from three mid- to large-sized mitochondrial genome alignments.

The Shape and Dimensionality of Phylogenetic Tree-Space Based on Mitochondrial Genomes