English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A considerable body of evidence suggests that the deleterious meiotic effects of pericentric inversions in F1 hybrids can be overcome by changes in chiasma location and various means of non-homologous pairing. Such overriding mechanisms may render pericentric inversions benign and increase the likelihood of their fixation in population isolates. It has been argued that overriding mechanisms of this type negate the involvement of pericentric inversions as reproductive isolating mechanisms in speciation. It is suggested, however, that the involvement of pericentric inversions in speciation should be considered on two levels. First, that by reducing meiotic effects in F1 hybrids, overriding mechanisms facilitate the fixation of pericentric inversions. Secondly, when contact hybridization occurs between the chromosomally derived and parental populations second-level effects may be encountered. That is, the recombinational effects of pericentric inversion differences on coadapted gene complexes (sensu Brncic, 1954, Shaw &amp; Coates, 1983) enforce profound inviability barriers in F2 and backcross matings. In this way, multiple pericentric inversions may act as significant post-mating isolating mechanisms, whereas individual inversions with less significant second-level effects may not.

A dual level model for speciation by multiple pericentric inversions