English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

PurposeTo quantify the additional information provided by ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography, compared with 7-field standard imaging, in patients with retinal vasculitis (RV).Patients and methodsRetrospective case series of 106 patients.ResultsRetinal vascular pathology was identified by UWF FFA, but not by standard ETDRS 7-field area, in 62 patients (58.5%) and in 79 eyes (43.4%). The pathology included active RV (47 eyes, 25.8% of eyes); retinal ischaemia, or infarction (53 eyes, 29.1%); and retinal neovascularization (7 eyes, 3.8%). A change to management was made in 36 patients (34%). Of these, 21 (20% of all patients undergoing angiography) were made after the identification of retinal vascular pathology, which was found only on UWF FFA, outside the ETDRS area.ConclusionUltra-widefield fluorescein angiography has clear advantages over standard multi-field imaging. It is currently the standard method of assessment for RV in this centre.

Ultra-widefield fundus fluorescein angiography in the diagnosis and management of retinal vasculitis