English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

PurposeTo assess the influence of varying B-scan frame-sampling densities on retinal thickness and volume measurements from spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).MethodsVolume OCT data (512 × 128 macular cube over 6 × 6 mm) were collected from 39 eyes with neovascular AMD. All 128 B-scans in each image set were manually segmented, allowing quantification of the neurosensory retina, subretinal fluid (SRF), subretinal hyperreflective material (SRHM), and pigment epithelium detachment (PED). Thickness maps were generated for less dense subsets of scans, ranging from every other (64 B-scans) to every 64th (2 B-scans). For each less dense subset, foveal central subfield thickness and total macular volume (TMV) were compared with values obtained using all 128 scans (considered the reference).ResultsFor each parameter, the mean absolute difference compared with the reference increased with reducing B-scan density. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance until frame-sampling density was reduced to every eighth scan (ie, 16 B-scans spaced 375 μm apart) for neurosensory retina, and every fourth scan (ie, 32 B-scans spaced 188 μm apart) for SRF, SRHM, and PED. For neurosensory retina, the mean (% error) and maximum (% error) absolute differences in TMV were 0.02 mm 3 (0.24%) and 0.06 mm 3 (0.79%), respectively. Similarly, at a density of 32 B-scans, mean and maximum differences for SRF were 0.004 mm 3 (3.47%) and 0.02 mm 3 (22.22%), respectively. The mean differences for SRHM and PED were 0.01 mm 3 (8.03%) and 0.01 mm 3 (4.04%), respectively.ConclusionsA minimum of 16 equally spaced B-scans, covering a 6 × 6 mm area, appears necessary to generate retinal thickness measurements similar to those obtained using all 128 B-scans in eyes with choroidal neovascularization (CNV). When considering other CNV lesion features, a minimum of 16 B-scans for SRF and PED, and 32 B-scans for SRHM are required to generate volume maps similar to ground-truth values. These findings may have implications for the design of acquisition and grading protocols for clinical trials using OCT in neovascular AMD.

Impact of optical coherence tomography scanning density on quantitative analyses in neovascular age-related macular degeneration