English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Sir, Hearing impairment in the elderly is common.1 Patients experience greater levels of anxiety with the unknown,2 and being able to communicate with their surgeon reduces anxiety.3 It is the authors’ opinion that hearing impairment should be addressed, improving patient satisfaction following surgery. The Disability Discrimination Act (DDA), 2005 states that it is unlawful for service providers to treat people less favourably due to their disability, hence the importance of ensuring that patients can hear during their operation. We outline our strategies for supporting patients with hearing impairment during phacoemulsification surgery. Before surgery, adequate pre-operative assessment is required. This should be recorded at the time of listing and assessment, with a strategy formulated to improve communication and reduction of anxiety during surgery. If a patient uses two hearing aids, that on the side of the operation can be removed so as to avoid damage from it becoming wet. When a patient has one hearing aid on the opposite side of the operative eye, then this can be left in safely. For those who only have one device that is on the side of surgery, careful cover with Tegaderm, taking care to place it well anterior of the hair line, should protect the device from becoming wet (Figure 1). Care should be taken not to displace the hearing aid, as a mal-fitting device may squeak as a result of positive feedback, causing irritation to the patient and the surgeon, and losing its effectiveness. In one patient, despite these measures, the placement of a drape over the eye resulted in positive feedback. The patient is an 82-year-old retired lecturer with otosclerosis since childhood and despite several operations has severe hearing impairment in her right ear. She has hearing impairment on the left and uses a hearing aid on this side (Phonak, Zurich, Switzerland). When attending lectures, she uses additional transmitter and receiver devices (Figure 2). The transmitter is placed on the speakers’ lectern and sends the sound to a receiver held by the patient. The hearing aid is then programmed to pick up this sound from the receiver and allows the patient to hear the speaker from anywhere in the lecture theatre or even outside. This technique was adjusted for theatre during left cataract surgery. The same draping technique was used as in Figure 1, but also the surgeon (CL) had the transmitter on his person and the patient had the receiver on her person, allowing the patient to hear all instructions clearly with no feedback. There were no complications during surgery and the patient did not experience any anxiety. If despite the above measures a patient is unable to tolerate the procedure under local anaesthesia, a general anaesthetic may be used as it once was more commonly practised. We have described above our algorithmic approach when dealing with a patient with hearing impairment. By taking time and care to allow the patient to hear and communicate with the surgeon during the operation, they can have a better experience during the procedure, which would positively enhance their view of surgical success. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

An algorithmic approach to enhance communication with the hearing impaired during phacoemulsification surgery