English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Current thinking on the embryological origin of human corneal endothelium has it that this cellular population stems from neural crest precursors. There are arguments in support of this assumption but equally persuasive ones against it. We present a discussion of the evidence for and against a neural crest origin for human corneal endothelial cells. In suggesting that caution be applied to extrapolating from non-human work, we would question the fallibility of the current thinking on this subject. To denote human corneal dystrophies as neurocristopathies may be a premature assumption.

Do corneal endothelial dystrophies represent ocular neurocristopathies? A discussion on the available evidence