English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Dear Editor, HDAC inhibitors (HDACis) can suppress the growth and/or survival of tumor cells and thus far two HDACis, vorinostat and romidepsin, have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of hematological malignancies.1 Vorinostat is a potent HDACi that mediates tumor cell-selective apoptosis and we and others have previously shown that the induction of apoptosis correlates with therapeutic efficacy in mouse models of hematological cancer.2, 3, 4, 5 Although apoptosis may be the preferred mode of HDACi-induced cell death, it is clear that in tumor cells with nonfunctional apoptotic cascades, HDACi are capable of inducing a caspase-independent form of cell death.5, 6, 7 We recently demonstrated that Eμ-myc lymphomas devoid of Apaf-1 displayed a delayed cell death in response to HDACi treatment, and loss of Apaf-1 failed to affect therapeutic efficacy.5 The delayed HDACi-induced cell death was concomitant with biochemical and morphological changes characteristic of autophagy.5 Herein we utilized the genetically tractable Eμ-myc mouse model to address conflicting reports in the field regarding the importance of autophagy in regulating the anti-tumor responses of HDACi.6, 7, 8 To determine whether autophagy had any role in regulating the response of Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− cells to HDACi, we knocked down the expression of two key autophagy proteins (Atg5 and Atg7) using constitutive short-hairpin RNAs (shRNAs). We developed two distinct shRNAs against Atg5 and one shRNA against Atg7 that efficiently silenced the expression of Atg5 and Atg7, respectively (Figure 1a). To determine if knockdown of Atg5 or Atg7 impaired HDACi-mediated autophagy, we treated Atg5- and Atg7-shRNA-expressing Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas with vorinostat and determined the ratio of LC3-I/LC3-II by western blot. In Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− cells with decreased expression of Atg5 or Atg7, vorinostat-induced processing of LC3-I to LC3-II was greatly reduced (Figure 1a). We next evaluated the response of Atg5- and Atg7-shRNA-expressing Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas to increasing concentrations of vorinostat over time. Consistent with our previous results,5 a delay in the kinetics of cell death was observed in vorinostat-treated Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− compared with Eμ-myc lymphomas (Figure 1b). However, depletion of Atg5 or Atg7 did not affect vorinostat-mediated tumor cell death, indicating that inhibition of autophagy neither protected Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− cells from HDACi-mediated cell death nor potentiated its anticancer effect. To evaluate the response of Atg5- and Atg7-shRNA-expressing Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas to vorinostat in vivo, we transplanted lymphomas into recipient mice and treated tumor-bearing mice with vorinostat. Consistent with our in vitro data, Atg5- and Atg7-shRNA-expressing lymphomas were equally responsive to vorinostat and cleared with similar kinetics as control-shRNA-expressing lymphomas (Figure 1c). Finally, we determined whether inhibition of autophagy had any effect on the therapeutic efficacy of vorinostat in Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas. We observed an enhanced survival in mice bearing Atg5-shRNA Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas after treatment with vorinostat (median survival vorinostat: 43.5 days, median survival vehicle: 25 days, P<0.0084), which was similar to the therapeutic response seen with control-shRNA-expressing lymphomas (median survival vorinostat: 48 days compared with vehicle: 23.5 days, P<0.0001). In conclusion, our data demonstrate that there is no evidence supporting an essential role for autophagy in regulating the response of apoptosis-deficient tumors to HDACi. Recent data suggest that in tumor cells with apoptotic defects, inhibition of autophagy may potentiate the therapeutic response mediated by HDACi.7 In contrast, we provide evidence that combining autophagy inhibitors with HDACi may not be clinically beneficial in lymphomas with apoptotic defects. The authors declare no conflict of interest. MB was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (AMC2009-4457). RWJ is a Principal Research Fellow of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) and supported by NHMRC Program and Project Grants, the Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, Cancer Council Victoria, The Victorian Cancer Agency, The Leukemia Foundation of Australia and the Victorian Breast Cancer Research Consortium.

Induction of autophagy does not alter the anti-tumor effects of HDAC inhibitors