English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Sir, We write to draw attention to the recently published strategy of the Association of Cancer Physicians (ACP; Baird et al, 2016). This ACP strategy reflects a significant evolution of medical oncology planning and practice in the United Kingdom. Previous strategies necessarily focused upon the development of medical oncology as a research-based discipline whose main contribution to cancer care was the development and delivery of systemic anti-cancer therapies (SACT). In the last three decades, the specialty has undergone rapid expansion in consultant numbers and in the roles performed by medical oncologists. This requires a reassessment of our priorities and our role in providing the best cancer care and outcomes for patients. Despite recent growth, the number of medical oncology consultants per head of the population in the UK is low by European standards (de Azambuja et al, 2014). There is an increasing recognition within the UK that, despite substantial progress, the job of improving cancer outcomes is far from complete (Allemani et al, 2015), significantly as a consequence of relatively late diagnosis compared with comparable countries (Forbes et al, 2013; Jensen et al, 2015). With the need to develop and deliver increasing SACT, which results from new scientific understanding of cancer and the epidemiological pressures of the ageing population, our discipline will continue to be one of the most rapidly growing of all medical specialties. The strategy focuses on improving patient outcomes by a wide range of interventions and identifying the ways in which medical oncologists can contribute. It was ‘co-produced’ with cancer patients and is evidence-based with detailed supporting chapters written by ACP members and external advisors (Baird et al, 2016). Many of the recommendations of the Independent Cancer Taskforce in the UK (Independent Cancer Taskforce, 2015; ICTUK) are endorsed and integrated into our strategy. By working closely with other healthcare professionals, researchers, health service managers and, in particular, with patients, in implementing the recommendations of the Taskforce, we look forward to making a crucial and increasing contribution to improving cancer outcomes in the coming decades. Having contributed substantially to the improvements in cancer outcomes over the past 25 years, we are greatly encouraged that over 50% of UK cancer patients now survive their disease for 10 years or more. We are at a time not only of unprecedented acceleration of knowledge with regards to all aspects of cancer, but also of rapid change in terms of patient management and new therapies. To deliver better outcomes for patients, we must overcome challenges over the next decade, such as increased demand for cancer services and financial constraint in the NHS. We are committed in working with our patients and colleagues to improve the outcomes for cancer patients so that 75% of the patients survive for 10 years or more, with improved patient experience and quality of life, within the next 20 years. To contribute to this vision, over the next 3–5 years the ACP will work to achieve three broad goals:  We will share and converge our goals and commitments with those of the ICTUK (Independent Cancer Taskforce, 2015) and with the other clinical and non-clinical bodies engaged in improving outcomes for cancer patients. We will work with the Royal College of Physicians (www.rcplondon.ac.uk) and our colleagues in Clinical Oncology (Royal College of Radiologists—RCR) converging our strategies and workforce plans (www.rcr.ac.uk (Clinical oncology—the future shape of the specialty. Royal College of Radiologists (2014); Clinical oncology workforce: the case for expansion. Royal College of Radiologists (2014))). We have shared our strategy with the RCR early on and have agreed joint working where appropriate. We will collaborate and consult with cancer charities, including those that focus on individual tumour types, and with Macmillan Cancer Support (www.macmillan.org.uk) and Cancer Research UK (www.cancerresearchuk.org). The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Comment on ‘an Association of Cancer Physicians’ strategy for improving services and outcomes for cancer patients’