English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Informal efforts to “test” a laboratory corrupt the data stream, where integrity is crucial. As director of the laboratory that analysed the samples for the National Lynx Survey sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture's Forest Service (USFS), I am responding to the damaging yet unsubstantiated conclusions in your Opinion article “Lynch mob turns on lynx researchers”1 and News article “Fur flies over lynx survey's suspect samples”2 about sampling for Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis).My laboratory developed the protocol to distinguish among species of North American felids based on DNA analysis of hairs using known individuals across the geographical range of the target species, and comprehensively validated it using blind control tests both within our lab and at another lab.

False samples are not the same as blind controls