English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

THE author of this work would probably not resent the suggestion that he writes as an advocate or partisan, rather than as an impartial assessor, in a long-drawn-out dispute. The field he surveys is a well-trodden one—the relation between the Bible and the monuments—and his attitude is that of the most traditional and conservative of writers on this subject. His thesis throughout is to the effect that modern archaeological study has entirely disposed of the claims advanced on behalf of the textual criticism of the Old Testament. In his view the whole work of the critical school is discredited, and the labours of Hebrew scholars for more than a century past, so far from resulting in a truer and more accurate appreciation of the Hebrew text, have been worse than useless. His position may be indicated by the fact that he maintains the Unity of the book of Isaiah, and holds that the book of Daniel embodies the prophecies of a historic person of that name who prophesied in Babylon during the exile, and was written by him or by one of his contemporaries. It does not lie within the scope of this journal to follow the author along his controversial path. But with the best will in the world to be convinced, we cannot help feeling that he is engaged in that rather pathetic process of trying to put back the hands of the clock. We feel sure he would have been far more convincing had he proved himself a less thorough-going partisan.The Deciding Voice of the Monuments in Biblical Criticism.By Dr. M. G. Kyle. Pp. xvii + 320. (London: S.P.C.K., 1912.) Price 4s. net.