English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Previous studies have shown that attentional selection can be biased toward locations that are likely to contain a target and away from locations that are likely to contain a distractor. It is assumed that through statistical learning, participants are able to extract the regularities in the display, which in turn biases attentional selection. The present study employed the additional singleton task to examine the ability of participants to extract regularities that occurred across trials. In four experiments, we found that participants were capable of picking up statistical regularities concerning target positions across trials both in the absence and presence of distracting information. It is concluded that through statistical learning, participants are able to extract intertrial statistical associations regarding subsequent target location, which in turn biases attentional selection. We argue here that the weights within the spatial priority map can be dynamically adapted from trial to trial such that the selection of a target at a particular location increases the weights of the upcoming target location within the spatial priority map, giving rise to a more efficient target selection. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Statistical regularities across trials bias attentional selection.