English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Both the set of quantum states and the set of classical states described by symplectic tomographic probability distributions (tomograms) are studied. It is shown that the sets have a common part but there exist tomograms of classical states which are not admissible in quantum mechanics and, vice versa, there exist tomograms of quantum states which are not admissible in classical mechanics. The role of different transformations of reference frames in the phase space of classical and quantum systems (scaling and rotation) determining the admissibility of tomograms as well as the role of quantum uncertainty relations are elucidated. The union of all admissible tomograms of both quantum and classical states is discussed in the context of interaction of quantum and classical systems. Negative probabilities in classical and quantum mechanics corresponding to tomograms of classical and quantum states are compared with properties of nonpositive and nonnegative density operators, respectively. The role of the semigroup of scaling transforms of the Planck's constant is discussed.

Classical Mechanics Is not the ħ, 0 Limit of Quantum Mechanics