English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A recent criticism of cosmological methodology and achievements by Disney(2000) is assessed. Some historical and epistemological fallacies in the saidarticle have been highlighted. It is shown that---both empirically andepistemologically---modern cosmology lies on sounder foundations than it isportrayed. A brief historical account demonstrates that this form ofunsatisfaction with cosmology has had a long tradition, and rather meagreresults in the course of the XX century.Comment: 11 pages, no figures; a criticism of astro-ph/0009020; Gen. Rel.  Grav., accepted for publicatio

Comment: Laudatores Temporis Acti, or Why Cosmology Is Alive and Well—A Reply to Disney