English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Internal energy selected halomethane cations CH(3)Cl(+), CH(2)Cl(2)(+), CHCl(3)(+), CH(3)F(+), CH(2)F(2)(+), CHClF(2)(+), and CBrClF(2)(+) were prepared by vacuum ultraviolet photoionization, and their lowest energy dissociation channel studied using imaging photoelectron photoion coincidence spectroscopy (iPEPICO). This channel involves hydrogen atom loss for CH(3)F(+), CH(2)F(2)(+), and CH(3)Cl(+), chlorine atom loss for CH(2)Cl(2)(+), CHCl(3)(+), and CHClF(2)(+), and bromine atom loss for CBrClF(2)(+). Accurate 0 K appearance energies, in conjunction with ab initio isodesmic and halogen exchange reaction energies, establish a thermochemical network, which is optimized to update and confirm the enthalpies of formation of the sample molecules and their dissociative photoionization products. The ground electronic states of CHCl(3)(+), CHClF(2)(+), and CBrClF(2)(+) do not confirm to the deep well assumption, and the experimental breakdown curve deviates from the deep-well model at low energies. Breakdown curve analysis of such shallow well systems supplies a satisfactorily succinct route to the adiabatic ionization energy of the parent molecule, particularly if the threshold photoelectron spectrum is not resolved and a purely computational route is unfeasible. The ionization energies have been found to be 11.47 ± 0.01 eV, 12.30 ± 0.02 eV, and 11.23 ± 0.03 eV for CHCl(3), CHClF(2), and CBrClF(2), respectively. The updated 0 K enthalpies of formation, Δ(f)H(o)(0K)(g) for the ions CH(2)F(+), CHF(2)(+), CHCl(2)(+), CCl(3)(+), CCl(2)F(+), and CClF(2)(+) have been derived to be 844.4 ± 2.1, 601.6 ± 2.7, 890.3 ± 2.2, 849.8 ± 3.2, 701.2 ± 3.3, and 552.2 ± 3.4 kJ mol(-1), respectively. The Δ(f)H(o)(0K)(g) values for the neutrals CCl(4), CBrClF(2), CClF(3), CCl(2)F(2), and CCl(3)F and have been determined to be -94.0 ± 3.2, -446.6 ± 2.7, -702.1 ± 3.5, -487.8 ± 3.4, and -285.2 ± 3.2 kJ mol(-1), respectively.

A Halomethane Thermochemical Network from iPEPICO Experiments and Quantum Chemical Calculations