English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The splicing function of SR proteins is regulated by multisite phosphorylation of their C-terminal RS (arginine-serine rich) domains. SRPK1 has been shown to phosphorylate the prototype SR protein SRSF1 using a directional mechanism in which 11 serines flanked by arginines are sequentially fed from a docking groove in the large lobe of the kinase domain to the active site. Although this process is expected to operate on lengthy arginine-serine repeats (≥8), many SR proteins contain smaller repeats of only 1-4 dipeptides, raising the question of how alternate RS domain configurations are phosphorylated. To address this, we studied a splice variant of Tra2β that contains a C-terminal RS domain with short arginine-serine repeats [Tra2β(ΔN)]. We showed that SRPK1 selectively phosphorylates several serines near the C-terminus of the RS domain. SRPK1 uses a distributive mechanism for Tra2β(ΔN) where the rate-limiting step is the dissociation of the protein substrate rather than nucleotide exchange as in the case of SRSF1. Although a functioning docking groove is required for efficient SRSF1 phosphorylation, this conserved structural element is dispensable for Tra2β(ΔN) phosphorylation. These large shifts in mechanism are likely to account for the slower net turnover rate of Tra2β(ΔN) compared to SRSF1 and may signal fundamental differences in phosphorylation among SR proteins with distinctive arginine-serine profiles. Overall, these data indicate that SRPK1 conforms to changes in RS domain architecture using a flexible kinetic mechanism and selective usage of a conserved docking groove.

Splicing Kinase SRPK1 Conforms to the Landscape of Its SR Protein Substrate