English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

(R)- and (S)-2-hydroxypropyl-CoM (R-HPC and S-HPC) are produced as intermediates in bacterial propylene metabolism from the nucleophilic addition of coenzyme M to (R)- and (S)-epoxypropane, respectively. Two highly enantioselective dehydrogenases (R-HPCDH and S-HPCDH) belonging to the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family catalyze the conversion of R-HPC and S-HPC to 2-ketopropyl-CoM (2-KPC), which undergoes reductive cleavage and carboxylation to produce acetoacetate. In the present study, one of three copies of S-HPCDH enzymes present on a linear megaplasmid in Xanthobacter autotrophicus strain Py2 has been cloned and overexpressed, allowing the first detailed side by side characterization of the R-HPCDH and S-HPCDH enzymes. The catalytic triad of S-HPCDH was found to consist of Y156, K160, and S143. R211 and K214 were identified as the amino acid residues coordinating the sulfonate of CoM in S-HPC. R211A and K214A mutants were severely impaired in the oxidation of S-HPC or reduction of 2-KPC but were largely unaffected in the oxidation and reduction of aliphatic alcohols and ketones. Kinetic analyses using R- and S-HPC as substrates revealed that enantioselectivity in R-HPCDH (value, 944) was dictated largely by differences in k(cat) while enantioselectivity for S-HPCDH (value, 1315) was dictated largely by changes in K(m). S-HPCDH had an inherent high enantioselectivity for producing (S)-2-butanol from 2-butanone that was unaffected by modulators that interact with the sulfonate binding site. The tertiary alcohol 2-methyl-2-hydroxypropyl-CoM (M-HPC) was a competitive inhibitor of R-HPCDH-catalyzed R-HPC oxidation, with a K(is) similar to the K(m) for R-HPC, but was not an inhibitor of S-HPCDH. The primary alcohol 2-hydroxyethyl-CoM was a substrate for both R-HPCDH and S-HPCDH with identical K(m) values. The pH dependence of kinetic parameters suggests that the hydroxyl group is a larger contributor to S-HPC binding to S-HPCDH than for R-HPC binding to R-HPCDH. It is proposed that active site constraints within the S-HPCDH prevent proper binding of R-HPC and M-HPC due to steric clashes with the improperly aligned methyl group on the C2 carbon, resulting in a different mechanism for controlling substrate specificity and enantioselectivity than present in the R-HPCDH.

biochemistry

Molecular Basis for Enantioselectivity in the (<i>R</i>)- and (<i>S</i>)-Hydroxypropylthioethanesulfonate Dehydrogenases, a Unique Pair of Stereoselective Short-Chain Dehydrogenases/Reductases Involved in Aliphatic Epoxide Carboxylation

Molecular Basis for Enantioselectivity in the (R)- and (S)-Hydroxypropylthioethanesulfonate Dehydrogenases, a Unique Pair of Stereoselective Short-Chain Dehydrogenases/Reductases Involved in Aliphatic Epoxide Carboxylation