English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Here, using ab initio calculations, we investigated the interaction between transition metals (M) and diamond C(111) surfaces. As a physical parameter describing the catalytic effect of a transition metal on diamond growth, we considered interfacial energy difference, Δ E  int , between 1 × 1 and 2 × 1 models of M/C(111). The results showed that the transition-metal elements in the middle of the periodic table (groups 4-10) favor a 1 × 1 M/C(111) structure with diamond bulk-like interfaces, while the elements at the sides of the periodic table (groups 3, 11, and 12) favor a 2 × 1 M/C(111) structure with the 2 × 1 Pandey chain structure of C(111) underneath M. In addition, calculations of MC carbide formation for early transition metals (groups 3-6) showed that they have a tendency to form MC rather than M/C(111), which explains their low efficiency as catalysts for diamond growth. Further analysis suggests that Δ E  int could serve as another parameter (catalytic descriptor) for describing catalytic diamond growth in addition to the conventional parameter of the melting temperature of M.

Importance of Interfacial Structures in the Catalytic Effect of Transition Metals on Diamond Growth