English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

α3β4 nAChRs have been implicated in various pathophysiological conditions. However, the expression profile of α3β4 nAChRs and α6/α3β4 nAChRs overlap in a variety of tissues. To distinguish between these two subtypes, we redesigned peptide 1 (α-conotoxin TxID), which inhibits α3β4 and α6/α3β4 nAChR subtypes. We systematically mutated 1 to evaluate analogue selectivity for α3β4 vs α6/α3β4 nAChRs expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. One analogue, peptide 7 ([S9A]TxID), had 46-fold greater potency for α3β4 versus α6/α3β4 nAChRs. Peptide 7 had IC 50 s &gt; 10 μM for other nAChR subtypes. Molecular dynamics simulations suggested that Ser-9 of TxID was involved in a weak hydrogen bond with β4 Lys-81 in the α6β4 binding site but not in the α3β4 binding site. When Ser-9 was substituted by an Ala, this hydrogen bond interaction was disrupted. These results provide further molecular insights into the selectivity of 7 and provide a guide for designing ligands that block α3β4 nAChRs.

α-Conotoxin [S9A]TxID Potently Discriminates between α3β4 and α6/α3β4 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors