English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We analyze a mixed quantum-classical algorithm recently derived from the exact factorization equations [Min, Agostini, Gross, PRL 115, 073001 (2015)] to show the role of the different terms in the algorithm in bringing about decoherence and wavepacket branching. The algorithm has the structure of Ehrenfest equations plus a "coupled-trajectory" term for both the electronic and nuclear equations, and we analyze the relative roles played by the different nonadiabatic terms in these equations, including how they are computed in practice. In particular, we show that while the coupled-trajectory term in the electronic equation is essential in yielding accurate dynamics, that in the nuclear equation has a much smaller effect. A decoherence time is extracted from the electronic equations and compared with that of augmented fewest-switches surface-hopping. We revisit a series of nonadiabatic Tully model systems to illustrate our analysis.

Coupled-Trajectory Mixed Quantum-Classical Algorithm: A Deconstruction