English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In a departure from conventional chemical approaches, data-driven models of chemical reactions have recently been shown to be statistically successful using machine learning. These models, however, are largely black box in character and have not provided the kind of chemical insights that historically advanced the field of chemistry. To examine the knowledgebase of machine-learning models-what does the machine learn-this article deconstructs black-box machine-learning models of a diverse chemical reaction data set. Through experimentation with chemical representations and modeling techniques, the analysis provides insights into the nature of how statistical accuracy can arise, even when the model lacks informative physical principles. By peeling back the layers of these complicated models we arrive at a minimal, chemically intuitive model (and no machine learning involved). This model is based on systematic reaction-type classification and Evans-Polanyi relationships within reaction types which are easily visualized and interpreted. Through exploring this simple model, we gain deeper understanding of the data set and uncover a means for expert interactions to improve the model's reliability.

What Does the Machine Learn? Knowledge Representations of Chemical Reactivity