English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

This study focuses on the comparative evaluation of star (branched) and linear poly(l,d-lactic acid) (PDLLA) as degradable materials employed in controlled release. The polymers were prepared via ring-opening polymerization initiated by decanol (linear), pentaerythritol (4-armed star) and dipentaerythritol (6-armed star), and processed both in the form of films and nanoparticles. Independent of the length or number of their arms, star polymers degrade slower than linear polymers, possibly through a surface (vs bulk) mechanism. Further, the release of a model drug (atorvastatin) followed zero-order-like kinetics for the branched polymers, and first-order kinetics for linear PDLLA. Using NHOst osteoblastic cells, both linear and star polymers were devoid of any significant toxicity and released atorvastatin in a bioavailable form; cell adhesion was considerably lower on star polymer films, and the slower release from their nanoparticles appeared to be beneficial to avoid atorvastatin overdosing.

The Effect of Branching (Star Architecture) on Poly(d,l-lactide) (PDLLA) Degradation and Drug Delivery