English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

(Maher 2012) introduced an approach for relative expressiveness of defeasiblelogics, and two notions of relative expressiveness were investigated. Using thefirst of these definitions of relative expressiveness, we show that all thedefeasible logics in the DL framework are equally expressive under thisformulation of relative expressiveness. The second formulation of relativeexpressiveness is stronger than the first. However, we show that logicsincorporating individual defeat are equally expressive as the correspondinglogics with team defeat. Thus the only differences in expressiveness of logicsin DL arise from differences in how ambiguity is handled. This completes thestudy of relative expressiveness in DL begun in \cite{Maher12}.

Relative Expressiveness of Defeasible Logics II